Economy
Right
United States

Fed Caves to Market Pressure, Hints at Premature Rate Cuts

Critics warn central bank risks repeating the mistakes of the 1970s

Fox NewsBy Michael Torres5 min read
Fed Caves to Market Pressure, Hints at Premature Rate Cuts

The Federal Reserve appears to be buckling under intense pressure from Wall Street and the White House, signaling that interest rate cuts could come as early as next quarter despite inflation remaining well above the central bank's stated target.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell's comments Wednesday were widely interpreted as a capitulation to market demands, raising serious questions about the independence of America's most powerful economic institution. The S&P 500 jumped 2.1% on the news — a sugar high that analysts warn may not last.

"This has all the hallmarks of a politically motivated pivot," said Dr. Robert Kessler, a former Fed advisor now at the Heritage Foundation. "We've seen this movie before. The Fed eased too early in the 1970s and we got a decade of stagflation."

While the administration has been publicly pressuring the Fed to lower rates ahead of the midterm elections, Powell insisted the decision was driven purely by data. Core inflation at 2.4% is still above the 2% target, and the labor market, while cooling, remains tight by historical standards.

The real concern, critics argue, is that the Fed is prioritizing short-term market stability over long-term price stability. "Every time the market throws a tantrum, the Fed rushes to soothe it," noted economist Lisa Chang. "That's not monetary policy — that's market babysitting."

Government spending continues to run at historically elevated levels, adding fuel to inflationary pressures that rate cuts would only exacerbate. The national debt has surpassed $37 trillion, with interest payments alone consuming an ever-larger share of the federal budget.

Supporters of the pivot argue that the economy is showing clear signs of slowing and that waiting too long to cut rates risks tipping the country into a recession. But the question remains: is the cure worse than the disease?